Page 65 - MODUL SASING XII NEW_EDIT TIM
P. 65

Read the statements then checklist (ѵ) the option that suit on you.


                              Statements                Definitely    Yes     Maybe       No     No at all
                  The    explanation   is   easy    to
                  understand.

                  The task is easy to do.

                  I  fully  understand  the  material  in

                  this chapter.



                 K. Formative Test



               Cognitive Assessment

                 A.  Read the questions and choose the best answer

                   The text is for number 1-5

                              Cultivation of a single crop on a given tract of land leads eventually to decreased yields. One
               reason for this is that harmful bacterial phytopathogens, organisms parasitic on plant hosts, increase
               in  the  soil  surrounding  plant  roots.  The  problem  can  be  cured  by  crop  rotation,  denying  the
               pathogens a suitable host for period of time. However, even if crops are not rotated, the severity of
               diseases  brought  on  by  such  phytopathogens  often  decreases  after  a  number  or  years  as  the
               microbial population of the soil changes and the soil becomes “suppressive” to those diseases. While
               there may be many reasons for this phenomenon, it is clear that levels of certain bacteria, such as
               Pseudomonas fl uorescens, a bacterium antagonistic to a number of harmful phytopathogens, are
               greater in suppressive than in nonsuppressive soil. This suggests that the presence of such bacteria
               suppresses phytopathogens. There is now considerable experimental support for this view. Wheat
               yield increases of 27 percent have been obtained in fi eld trials by treatment of wheat seeds with fl
               uorescent pseudomonads. Similar  treatment of sugar beets, cotton, and potatoes has had similar
               results.
                                These improvements in crop yields through the application of Pseudomonas fl uorescens
               suggest  that  agriculture  could  benefi  t  from  the  use  of  bacteria  genetically  altered  for  specifi  c
               purposes. For example, a form of phytopathogen altered to remove its harmful properties could be
               released into the environment in quantities favorable to its competing with and eventually excluding
               the  harmful  normal  strain.  Some  experiments  suggest  that  deliberately  releasing  altered
               nonpathogenic  Pseudomonas  syringae  could  crowd  out  the  nonaltered  variety  that  causes  frost
               damage. Opponents of such research have objected that the deliberate and large-scale release of
               genetically altered bacteria might have deleterious results. Proponents, on the other hand, argue
               that  this  particular  strain  is  altered  only  by  the  removal  of  the  gene  responsible  for  the  strain’s







                                                                                                                58
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70